<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time for some CSS debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paulrhayes.com/2009-03/time-for-some-css-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paulrhayes.com/2009-03/time-for-some-css-debate/</link>
	<description>The web musings and experiments of.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 05:00:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: achao</title>
		<link>http://www.paulrhayes.com/2009-03/time-for-some-css-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>achao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fofronline.com/?p=41#comment-44</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.paulrhayes.com/2009-03/time-for-some-css-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 07:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fofronline.com/?p=41#comment-43</guid>
		<description>The form ate the greater/less thans, but I hope I got my point across!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The form ate the greater/less thans, but I hope I got my point across!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.paulrhayes.com/2009-03/time-for-some-css-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 07:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fofronline.com/?p=41#comment-42</guid>
		<description>I think CSS animations are a natural extension of styling.

How should you express animations in a formal way?

With JavaScript?    It&#039;s been done for well over a decade.   A thousand ways, and no end in sight.

The concept of codeless animation on the web isn&#039;t new.

SMIL2 (HTML+TIME) in IE 5.5+ (summer 1999) was a good start, but the more I used it back when it came out, the more I wanted to just style some element animation without copying a dozen attributes every time.


Which looks more natural?


.clickme {background-color: #000; }
.clickme:hover { transition: background-color 1s linear #00f; }

Click here

or

Click here

 $(&#039;.clickme&#039;).style.backgroundColor.animate(&quot;#000&quot;, &quot;#0F0&quot;, &quot;hover&quot;, 0, 100);


(apologies for the pidgin jQuery and css anim - it would look something like that though)


One more thing - if tied to JS, you cannot guarantee when an animation starts/stops, how it&#039;s supposed to degrade when there&#039;s 1000 animated elements.   Stopping on a JS error somewhere else, etc.

We already have the mess of that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think CSS animations are a natural extension of styling.</p>
<p>How should you express animations in a formal way?</p>
<p>With JavaScript?    It’s been done for well over a decade.   A thousand ways, and no end in sight.</p>
<p>The concept of codeless animation on the web isn’t new.</p>
<p>SMIL2 (HTML+TIME) in IE 5.5+ (summer 1999) was a good start, but the more I used it back when it came out, the more I wanted to just style some element animation without copying a dozen attributes every time.</p>
<p>Which looks more natural?</p>
<p>.clickme {background-color: #000; }<br />
.clickme:hover { transition: background-color 1s linear #00f; }</p>
<p>Click here</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>Click here</p>
<p> $(‘.clickme’).style.backgroundColor.animate(“#000″, “#0F0”, “hover”, 0, 100);</p>
<p>(apologies for the pidgin jQuery and css anim — it would look something like that though)</p>
<p>One more thing — if tied to JS, you cannot guarantee when an animation starts/stops, how it’s supposed to degrade when there’s 1000 animated elements.   Stopping on a JS error somewhere else, etc.</p>
<p>We already have the mess of that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merlinvicki</title>
		<link>http://www.paulrhayes.com/2009-03/time-for-some-css-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>merlinvicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fofronline.com/?p=41#comment-41</guid>
		<description>nice debate. IMHO CSS is meant to style the page. With some basic effects like :hover CSS is a light/clean help but it should not extend to major handling of elements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice debate. IMHO CSS is meant to style the page. With some basic effects like :hover CSS is a light/clean help but it should not extend to major handling of elements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Kohll</title>
		<link>http://www.paulrhayes.com/2009-03/time-for-some-css-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Kohll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fofronline.com/?p=41#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Sorry, just some spelling: &#039;wreak&#039; should be &#039;reek&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, just some spelling: ‘wreak’ should be ‘reek’.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
